Gigabyte GA-H610M K DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H610M K DDR4  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230831
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 02:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 79.8
1-Core 165
2-Core 331
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 970
99% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,184
73% 1,184 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MLD M300 NVMe SSD 1TB
554GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMF0.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1819 1787 105 23 759 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,140
Write 1,812
Mixed 1,312
SusWrite 754
284% 1,255 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 61.2
205% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 887
DQ Mixed 942
673% 853 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 191%
Great: 295%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
62GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 132 128 129 247 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 323
Write 99.7
Mixed 127
SusWrite 170
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 17.2
72% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 41.4
DQ Write 43.7
DQ Mixed 37
29% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-ST41 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-H610M K DDR4 Builds (Compare 469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H610M K DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $403
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback