Gigabyte GA-A620M H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics235% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
26 days ago, 16 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A620M H  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 02:11
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$175
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 72.8
1-Core 208
2-Core 403
117% 228 Pts
4-Core 732
8-Core 1,196
118% 964 Pts
64-Core 1,392
86% 1,392 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 105%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
235% Outstanding
Lighting 336
Reflection 328
Parallax 341
274% 335 fps
MRender 475
Gravity 299
Splatting 216
257% 330 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 235%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 1TB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8308
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,124
Write 3,996
Mixed 2,541
790% 3,554 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 262
4K Mixed 99.3
368% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,940
DQ Write 1452
DQ Mixed 1,663
1,252% 1,685 MB/s
Poor: 255% Great: 506%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD58G560041 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 43.9
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 46.7
SC Write 58.1
SC Mixed 50.1
148% 51.6 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 129%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 165 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2WG3-
Typical GA-A620M H Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A620M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback