Lenovo 83EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83EM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 01:39
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13420H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 46.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 217
69% 130 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 409
49% 378 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3804) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5448
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 13.9
10% 15.3 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 15.8
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 412 312 162 17 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,540
Write 907
Mixed 984
SusWrite 235
203% 916 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 33.5
222% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 663
DQ Mixed 569
491% 732 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 176%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 24.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 17
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9052
Typical 83EM Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback