TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-1583

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Pulse GL66 12UGKV
MotherboardMSI MS-1583  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 22:54
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 62.8
1-Core 183
2-Core 348
102% 198 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 812
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 79%
 Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 1333) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3729
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 25.9
18% 24.9 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 22.2
21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 19.3%
 Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar ARES 2TB
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11296
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1754 1932 1908 2186 1438 1299 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 3,084
Write 2345
Mixed 2,172
SusWrite 1,753
523% 2,338 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 77.4
252% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 682
484% 631 MB/s
Poor: 256% ↑
This bench: 336%
 Great: 586%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
769GB free
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1871 2179 2140 1997 2106 2111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 345
Mixed 1,386
SusWrite 2,067
245% 1,067 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 72.7
239% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 712
510% 669 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑
This bench: 248%
 Great: 537%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 30.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 84.4%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 144 15.5" 1536 864 AUOAF90
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-1583 Builds (Compare 2,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-1583

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples1,345x
Core i9-12900HIntelBench 99%, 15,403 samples295x
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples284x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples834x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples486x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples363x
SSD
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBBench 252%, 10,807 samples907x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GBBench 203%, 4,667 samples341x
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBBench 389%, 5,529 samples100x
RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples965x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 15,291 samples291x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 87%, 6,443 samples189x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback