Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 22:15
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 165
2-Core 315
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 976
91% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 147
Parallax 150
119% 148 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 143
Splatting 120
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 198 170 159 193 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 386
Write 240
Mixed 270
SusWrite 184
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 26
89% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 137
116% 170 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB
13GB free
Firmware: DXM03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 74 79 77 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 261
Write 34.5
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 76.6
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 18
56% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 92.9
DQ Write 31.6
DQ Mixed 93
61% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 108%
Adata XPG SX900 512GB-$189
41GB free
Firmware: 5.0.7b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 117 116 129 132 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 405
Write 276
Mixed 268
SusWrite 128
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 20.6
74% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 93.5
82% 127 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 69%
Liteonit LCT-256M3S 2.5 7mm 256GB
29GB free
Firmware: VRDC
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 827
Write 624
Mixed 121
115% 524 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 22.8
82% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 438
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 228
216% 340 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 94%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
144GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 133
Write 131
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 78.6
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 25.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 27.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 100 34.1" 3440 1369 GSM77BF LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,017
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback