Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics242% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 22:14
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 726
68% 564 Pts
64-Core 1148
71% 1148 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
242% Outstanding
Lighting 325
Reflection 413
Parallax 460
265% 399 fps
MRender 535
Gravity 359
Splatting 257
299% 384 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 242%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 129 142 151 154 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 484
Write 250
Mixed 252
SusWrite 153
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 39.6
135% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 358
254% 326 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 124%
WD Blue SN580 1TB
340GB free
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2067 2203 2301 2225 962 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,434
Write 2,386
Mixed 2,059
SusWrite 1,695
482% 2,143 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 59.7
213% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,210
DQ Write 873
DQ Mixed 990
754% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 313%
Great: 598%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 94 106 106 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 26.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3202 Q32G2WG3
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback