HP OMEN Gaming Laptop 16-ae0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN Gaming Laptop 16-ae0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8CC0
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 20:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 220
2-Core 433
125% 244 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,480
138% 1,151 Pts
64-Core 2759
171% 2759 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 116%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8CC0) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.19% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 11.5
8% 12.5 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 11.4
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP02AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1810 1849 1163 677 689 677 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,021
Write 1,906
Mixed 1,474
SusWrite 1,144
367% 1,636 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 81.1
270% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1213
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 938
662% 859 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 271%
Great: 336%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3PB0-CWMOL 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
MC Read 73.8
MC Write 62
MC Mixed 65.7
192% 67.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 49.6
SC Mixed 27.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 170%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 16" 1280 720 CMN1629
Typical OMEN Gaming Laptop 16-ae0xxx Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO

System: HP OMEN Gaming Laptop 16-ae0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback