Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_F515EA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_F515EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515EA
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 18:54
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 202
65% 122 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 280
38% 280 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 15CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 9.8
6% 7.5 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 9
7% 9.03 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane H20 with SSD 512GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 770 831 656 819 815 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 10.2
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 20 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0046
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_F515EA Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_F515EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback