HP EliteBook 830 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 830 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B3
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 18:53
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8350U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 44
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 74.7
33% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 216
22% 180 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 83B3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 3
Parallax 3.4
3% 3.2 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 707 253 264 283 268 265 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 788
Write 522
Mixed 541
SusWrite 340
122% 548 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 26.8
88% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 288
198% 246 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 216%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 4 60 13.2" 1280 720 CMN1375
Typical EliteBook 830 G5 Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 830 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback