Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700H 52,857 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 61 1-Core 141 2-Core 294 86% 165 Pts	4-Core 567 8-Core 949 92% 758 Pts	64-Core 1,406 87% 1,406 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1598) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1692 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	20.1% Poor	Lighting 23.9 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 26.5 20% 25.9 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 37 Splatting 20.8 21% 26.7 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-512G-1014 512GB 1,003 User benchmarks, average bench 379% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 61470100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,860 Write 3,677 Mixed 2,543 748% 3,360 MB/s	4K Read 69 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 81.2 281% 95.5 MB/s	DQ Read 957 DQ Write 665 DQ Mixed 842 620% 821 MB/s
Poor: 245% Great: 479%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOD 1x16GB 1,053 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 18.8 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	12%	40	197	56	165	15.5"	1280 720	BOE0ABA

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 28%

Raft

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	719x
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 122%, 8,682 samples	406x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	389x

SSD
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBNvmeBench 407%, 6,767 samples	747x
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA512TFH 512GBNvmeBench 331%, 3,976 samples	356x
WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-512G-1014 512GBNvmeBench 379%, 1,003 samples	159x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	796x
MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GBMicronBench 120%, 12,360 samples	159x
HMCG66MEBSA092N 2x8GBHynixBench 121%, 4,275 samples	132x