Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30ASS0R40D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30ASS0R40D  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 18:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 198
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 448
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 358.50
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 10.5
10% 13 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 14.1
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB2Q512G1001 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2230001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 368 375 374 377 374 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 302
Write 340
Mixed 214
SusWrite 368
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 26.2
90% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 100
118% 205 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 60 23.5" 1920 1009 ACR009F X243HQ
Typical 30ASS0R40D Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30ASS0R40D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback