Asrock B560M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 16:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 278
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 790
79% 641 Pts
64-Core 1450
90% 1450 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 110
Parallax 148
130% 139 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 125
Splatting 101
109% 139 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 158 155 157 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 497
Write 162
Mixed 170
SusWrite 157
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 26.3
104% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 160
140% 214 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-DTBKD3 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 25.1
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 28.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 ACR06CF VG270U P
Typical B560M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback