Lenovo 21JN0073US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
26 days ago, 26 days ago.
SystemLenovo 21JN0073US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21JN0073US
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 15:35
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 179
2-Core 302
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 591
64% 507 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 50D1) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 22.5
16% 22.3 fps
MRender 19.2
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 19
18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-512G-1201 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2899
Write 2,171
Mixed 1,865
512% 2,312 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 73.6
252% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 520
395% 544 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 423%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Micron MT40A1G16RC-062E:B 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 30.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 23.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 14 60 16" 1536 889 LEN41B5
Typical 21JN0073US Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 21JN0073US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback