Lenovo 82SH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82SH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2240 x 1400 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 15:34
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 66
1-Core 184
2-Core 335
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 832
93% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,129
70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3E78) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5244
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.4% Below average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 38.5
41% 42.5 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 44.8
Splatting 31.7
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL2 512GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1696 801 269 278 275 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2,156
Write 1,900
Mixed 1,934
SusWrite 604
369% 1,648 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 85.7
260% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 809
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 677
478% 617 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 231%
Great: 404%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
137% Outstanding
MC Read 59.7
MC Write 49.9
MC Mixed 49.4
151% 53 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 27
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 137%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 4% 51 70 2 60 26" 1280 720 LEN9121
Typical 82SH Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82SH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback