Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 15:30
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 172
2-Core 340
107% 200 Pts
4-Core 676
8-Core 1,298
117% 987 Pts
64-Core 2,151
133% 2,151 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 201
Parallax 222
172% 212 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 162
Splatting 127
136% 173 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 148%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2661
Write 2,438
Mixed 1,907
520% 2,336 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 95.4
319% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,368
DQ Write 1,083
DQ Mixed 1,197
904% 1216 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
568GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,557
Write 1,743
Mixed 1,376
349% 1,559 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 72.9
254% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,414
DQ Write 1,166
DQ Mixed 1,242
943% 1,274 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 280%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
469GB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,377
Write 640
Mixed 1,509
330% 1,509 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 66.8
223% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,457
DQ Write 1,223
DQ Mixed 1,307
988% 1,329 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 370%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 238
Write 200
Mixed 140
143% 192 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.6
1,938% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
900GB free
Firmware: MS2OA810
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 188
Write 118
Mixed 35.7
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.2
Write 7.2
Mixed 14.7
16% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 32.2
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 36.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 16 170 27" 2560 1377 ACR081B XV272U V
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,533
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback