HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-r0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-r0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BBE
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 15:28
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 65.8
1-Core 181
2-Core 371
105% 206 Pts
4-Core 729
8-Core 1,083
113% 906 Pts
64-Core 1,649
102% 1,649 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8BBE) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 23
16% 22 fps
MRender 19.6
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 16.1
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AP40
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,026
Write 2,379
Mixed 1797
463% 2,067 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 70.4
232% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 693
496% 648 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 428%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
134% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 48.1
MC Mixed 49.7
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 25.4
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 134%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 16" 1280 720 BOE0B9E
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-r0xxx Builds (Compare 932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-r0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback