Default H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D22
MotherboardDefault H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210607
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 15:05
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 213
2-Core 428
123% 240 Pts
4-Core 848
8-Core 1,486
141% 1,167 Pts
64-Core 2,546
158% 2,546 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8818) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 119
Parallax 122
104% 123 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 100
Splatting 87.2
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$140
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 374
Write 252
Mixed 279
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 34.2
144% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 153
143% 223 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 89%
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SBM02103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,113
Write 2257
Mixed 1,512
437% 1,961 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 284
4K Mixed 46.4
291% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 1875
DQ Mixed 613
671% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 318
Write 363
Mixed 320
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 26.5
82% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 179
132% 171 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 6
Mixed 12
34% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
39% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 41.6
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 46.5
SC Mixed 30
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 118%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 21.7" 1920 1080 LEN65FE LEN G25-10
Typical H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22) Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Default H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback