Lenovo 90T00003US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90T00003US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3741
Memory2.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 15:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 74.5
1-Core 186
2-Core 367
109% 209 Pts
4-Core 719
8-Core 1,242
119% 981 Pts
64-Core 2,117
131% 2,117 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 105%
Great: 115%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Legend(17AA 2090) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 142
Parallax 116
101% 127 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 99.2
Splatting 86.1
84% 105 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Legend(17AA 3741) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5187
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
8.3% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 10.3
8% 11.2 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 10.4
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.3%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZL 512GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L01C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,382
Write 1,498
Mixed 1,155
370% 1,679 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 83.5
284% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 449
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 404
376% 567 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
62GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 95 94 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 129
Write 123
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 95.5
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
145GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 34.4
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 27
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 2R 3G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 15% 100 214 57 75 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical 90T00003US Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90T00003US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback