Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 14:45
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 163
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 91.5
15% 106 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.Q1.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36% Below average
Lighting 48.5
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 62.3
40% 49.3 fps
MRender 33.1
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 25.7
29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 130 132 135 133 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.9% Average
Read 256
Write 156
Mixed 190
SusWrite 143
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 20.3
72% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 57.4
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 52.6
41% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
180GB free
Firmware: LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 99 99 101 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 99
59% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G HX426C16FB/4 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 18 80 19.4" 1600 900 AOC2070 2070W
Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 2,002 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback