Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507RE
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 14:22
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 70
1-Core 156
2-Core 302
93% 176 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 929
94% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,363
84% 1,363 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1EAC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.24.02
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
33% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 75.6
33% 54 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 49.3
33% 38.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,081
Write 1590
Mixed 1263
364% 1,645 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 31.8
176% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 32
DQ Mixed 56.5
87% 177 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 38.1
116% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 20.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 107%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN153C
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback