Lenovo 82Y3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82Y3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231219
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 14:16
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 71.8
1-Core 179
2-Core 352
104% 201 Pts
4-Core 727
8-Core 1281
121% 1,004 Pts
64-Core 2,046
127% 2,046 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3E67) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 29
20% 27.8 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 22.3
22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HDJD-00BL2 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QGXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,778
Write 1,495
Mixed 1,591
361% 1,621 MB/s
4K Read 73.9
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 113
361% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,394
DQ Write 1051
DQ Mixed 1,228
917% 1,224 MB/s
Poor: 241% Great: 404%
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-512G-1006 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,947
Write 1,980
Mixed 1,551
407% 1,826 MB/s
4K Read 71.4
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 98.4
355% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,759
DQ Write 1,401
DQ Mixed 1,520
1,154% 1,560 MB/s
Poor: 151% Great: 434%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G52C42S5.M8G1 Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 32GB
5200, 5600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 62.4
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 56.5
167% 58.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 25.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 147%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 165 16" 1280 720 AUOF1A7
Typical 82Y3 Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

System: Lenovo 82Y3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback