MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics255% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 14:04
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,138
101% 857 Pts
64-Core 2,736
169% 2,736 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 7901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
255% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 427
Parallax 787
256% 509 fps
MRender 536
Gravity 322
Splatting 480
366% 446 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 255%
Great: 294%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO 1TB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM21.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,086
Write 3,808
Mixed 1,808
578% 2,567 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 13.3
119% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 839
616% 812 MB/s
Poor: 185% Great: 463%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z4600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 56
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 42.6
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 34.8
84% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 124%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 23 160 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3209 M32UC
Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback