Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 19 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 13:33
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 995
93% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,440
89% 1,440 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85EB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2797 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 187
Parallax 181
137% 179 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 178
Splatting 122
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AL6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 32 33 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 415
Write 53
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 34.8
31% 144 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 20.1
91% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 49.9
DQ Mixed 42.5
56% 108 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 91%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
120GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 270 270 183 282 231 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,199
Write 688
Mixed 513
SusWrite 284
148% 671 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 83
275% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 801
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 173
211% 389 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 173%
Great: 236%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
449GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 138 136 138 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 170
Write 182
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 138
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 33.3
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 34.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ78C3 BenQ GW2750H
Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback