Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
26 days ago, 25 days ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240207
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 13:28
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 170
2-Core 338
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,198
112% 930 Pts
64-Core 1,674
104% 1,674 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Asus(1043 886D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 109
Parallax 122
101% 118 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 114
Splatting 96.9
91% 114 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
540GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,308
Write 4,796
Mixed 3,386
930% 4,163 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 106
258% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,647
DQ Write 1,343
DQ Mixed 1,511
1,127% 1,500 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 598%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
308GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 34.2
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 108%
Toshiba HDWD320 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: KS001A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 211
Write 180
Mixed 138
132% 176 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
1,015% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
192GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 134
Write 127
Mixed 17.9
67% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 32.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 28.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO Builds (Compare 3,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $974
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback