Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory14 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 13:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 198
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 473
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 50.4
45% 55.7 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 48.4
38% 46.3 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 66 75 74 68 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,722
Write 2,167
Mixed 452
SusWrite 97.5
247% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 6.9
102% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 515
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 204
172% 263 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 116%
Great: 394%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
568GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 114 116 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 126
Write 129
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 111
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
242% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 14 212 56 60 12.6" 1920 1080 AGO0001
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback