Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20181108
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	May 15 '24 at 13:23
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 94.7 1-Core 125 2-Core 233 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 778 75% 619 Pts	64-Core 1,056 65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.02 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 194 Parallax 186 143% 185 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 182 Splatting 127 120% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 267 267 262 262 254 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 481 Mixed 398 SusWrite 283 93% 414 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 52.9 175% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 354 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 63 89 119 117 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 105 Write 130 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 103 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GB 12,603 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.5% Very good	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 22.8 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 25.2 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 19: 0P 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
19%	26%	27	215	57	60	23.1"	1280 720	GSM5A1D 27MP55

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $175Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,712x
Core i5-8600KIntel $118Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	841x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	174x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	398x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	337x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	230x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	146x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	128x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $135Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	127x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	219x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	148x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	113x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $761

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16