Lenovo 81WB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81WB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220125
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 13:01
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 178
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 241
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3FB3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.8
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znt256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 823
Write 923
Mixed 809
191% 852 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 31.7
129% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 731
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 530
410% 568 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A512M16TB-062E:R Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 8 60 15.5" 1536 793 CMN15F5
Typical 81WB Builds (Compare 1,741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81WB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback