Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 12:08
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 333
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 1,018
101% 823 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Zotac(19DA 2630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 116
Parallax 119
104% 121 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 100
Splatting 87.6
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1472 124 125 929 127 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 2,007
Write 2,245
Mixed 1,517
SusWrite 484
350% 1,563 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 48.8
274% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 1,194
DQ Mixed 594
557% 848 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 234%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 54.3
MC Mixed 49.6
153% 53.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 28.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 139%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 23.8" 1280 720 GSM5C1A LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-B760 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 226%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 245%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback