HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, ,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 11:59
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
75% 139 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 700
61% 518 Pts
64-Core 819
51% 819 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.34
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 66.8
59% 70.4 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 68
Splatting 66.8
55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,249
Write 1,547
Mixed 1,294
306% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 50.6
172% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 747
DQ Mixed 932
684% 902 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 469%
Corsair EX100U 1TB
771GB free
Firmware: 000A
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 277
Write 316
Mixed 274
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 23.9
75% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 17.2
37% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,811
Write 35.7
Mixed 76
1,175% 1,641 MB/s
4K Read 596
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.7
25,392% 201 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
931GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 150
Mixed 19.9
123% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 21
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19.7
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 16 212 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 HWP3186 HP 22xw
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback