Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_M409DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_M409DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409DA
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 11:57
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 52
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 120
45% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 52.8
17% 110 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1B21) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 6.5
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ3 128GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 105 117 100 108 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 585
Write 196
Mixed 172
SusWrite 130
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 21.2
79% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 165
124% 168 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
693GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 122 122 120 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 92.8
Write 116
Mixed 67
SusWrite 121
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Kingston 9905711-032.A00G 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 10.6
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 13 60 13.9" 1366 768 CMN14D6
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_M409DA Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_M409DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback