Lenovo 83ER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83ER  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 11:57
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 175
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 286
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 384A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.9 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 8.1
7% 8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GEJ4X112N 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,435
Write 1,609
Mixed 1,242
320% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 33.6
161% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 397
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 262
196% 267 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 26.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 31 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9051
Typical 83ER Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83ER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback