Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive454% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 11:14
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14500-$234
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 85.9
1-Core 204
2-Core 400
120% 230 Pts
4-Core 770
8-Core 1,366
129% 1,068 Pts
64-Core 2,334
144% 2,334 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 115%
Great: 118%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 10.9
8% 11.9 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
519GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3808 3747 2591 1225 1239 1209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
454% Outstanding
Read 3,890
Write 3,674
Mixed 2,450
SusWrite 2303
690% 3,080 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 97.3
331% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,438
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 1,224
920% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 454%
Great: 537%
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
269GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1816 1818 1817 1816 883 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 1,406
Write 1,809
Mixed 1558
SusWrite 1,376
348% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 84.7
301% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,383
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 1,058
836% 1,167 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 288%
Great: 305%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$75
436GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 439 439 413 300 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 356
Write 424
Mixed 368
SusWrite 388
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 57.2
186% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 153
168% 283 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
86GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 146 147 148 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 141
Mixed 104
SusWrite 146
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
272GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 155 155 154 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 149
Write 146
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 154
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
551GB free
Firmware: D785
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 113 110 110 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 71.1
Write 108
Mixed 82
SusWrite 115
70% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
270% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 37.8
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 32.7
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 4 60 23.8" 1920 1009 DELD0D9 DELL P2419H
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 3,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback