Medion Crawler E50

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion Crawler E50  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPxxRNx1
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 11:09
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 71.2
1-Core 169
2-Core 331
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,000
103% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,228
76% 1,228 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A552) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4577
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.7 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-BICS5 512GB
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 60 110 77 81 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1332
Write 95.9
Mixed 431
SusWrite 124
107% 496 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 67.9
215% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 850
570% 705 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 157%
Great: 363%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 36.4
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 23.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0910
Typical Crawler E50 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion Crawler E50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback