AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive420% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
26 days ago, 25 days ago.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory16 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240122
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 09:45
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 172
2-Core 331
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,210
111% 927 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.2% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 50.9
Parallax 77.6
34% 56.9 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 43.6
Splatting 25.7
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
789GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3171 3165 3199 2551 1599 1610 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
420% Outstanding
Read 2,790
Write 3,284
Mixed 3,009
SusWrite 2549
657% 2,908 MB/s
4K Read 77.9
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 108
350% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,121
DQ Write 837
DQ Mixed 950
718% 969 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 420%
Great: 488%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3488 3512 3509 3499 3491 3501 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 1,935
Write 3,497
Mixed 2,326
SusWrite 3,500
641% 2,814 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 72.1
244% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,263
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 1,075
808% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 415%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
121% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 50
MC Mixed 42.6
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 25.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 121%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS2445 VA24EHF
Typical SER Builds (Compare 793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback