Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 256%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics245% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 09:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 172
2-Core 343
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 939
101% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
245% Outstanding
Lighting 353
Reflection 342
Parallax 361
288% 352 fps
MRender 500
Gravity 306
Splatting 222
266% 342 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 245%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1092 1103 1069 1139 1105 1118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2564
Write 1,326
Mixed 1,468
SusWrite 1,104
359% 1,616 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 59.7
209% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 78.4
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 110
96% 137 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 241%
Great: 372%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$75
828GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 418 436 444 404 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 514
Write 417
Mixed 359
SusWrite 420
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 34.4
107% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 43.7
44% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 41
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 41.8
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 106%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 ACR0490 XB271HU
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $760
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback