Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509JA
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 08:19
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 213
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 282
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1EC1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 10
Splatting 0.2
5% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM60.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 367 168 165 166 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 862
Write 971
Mixed 885
SusWrite 323
171% 760 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 61.2
215% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 499
360% 458 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 140%
Great: 226%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
829GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 124 122 122 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 69.9
Write 126
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 121
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 20.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback