Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 08:07
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 320GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 137
46% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 244
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 8.1
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 7.3
5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 404
Write 406
Mixed 352
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 28.6
96% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 296
216% 279 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
603GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 163
Write 192
Mixed 58.8
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.9
Write 4.7
Mixed 10.5
16% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 2.2
107% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF432C16BB3/16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 41 60 23.6" 1280 720 JRY2360 HDMI
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback