Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 273%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 281%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics248% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive377% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230926
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 07:47
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 192
2-Core 378
118% 222 Pts
4-Core 705
8-Core 1,344
122% 1,025 Pts
64-Core 1,760
109% 1,760 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 114%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765
Asus(1043 88DD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
248% Outstanding
Lighting 365
Reflection 349
Parallax 374
298% 363 fps
MRender 479
Gravity 300
Splatting 216
258% 331 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 248%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
818GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2587 2643 2709 2615 1599 1596 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2585
Write 2,815
Mixed 2617
SusWrite 2,291
582% 2,577 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 68.7
235% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,546
DQ Write 1,216
DQ Mixed 1,375
1,031% 1379 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 377%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD5U16G60C32LG 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 40.1
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 40.9
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 29.1
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 9 60 23" 1920 1009 SAM0A36 S23C350
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 273%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 276%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback