HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8917
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 05:16
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 85.4
1-Core 201
2-Core 398
119% 228 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 1,339
125% 1,040 Pts
64-Core 2,312
143% 2,312 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
HP(103C 8903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 118
Parallax 124
105% 124 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 102
Splatting 89.1
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,625
Write 2,104
Mixed 1,888
421% 1,872 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 74.3
276% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,528
DQ Write 1,196
DQ Mixed 1,316
997% 1,347 MB/s
Poor: 167% Great: 283%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
815GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 168
Mixed 91.7
109% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8MR-8XR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 35.7
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 29.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 0P 2R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 58% 19 193 12 144 23.8" 1920 1009 HPN36DA HP X24ih
Typical OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx Builds (Compare 1,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $920
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback