MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 04:33
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 93.3
40% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 154
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 96.1
52% 74.6 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 47.1
49% 62.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cs900 SSD 480GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Se10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 116 156 19 72 122 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.4% Poor
Read 196
Write 88.2
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 122
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 2.8
30% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 17.5
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 13.1
11% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron JICRBOOAN-8G1600PC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 6.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 55 75 23.8" 1280 720 VSC663B VA2406-FHD
Typical A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 1,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback