MSI PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E28
MotherboardMSI PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28)  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 00:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$299
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 216
2-Core 427
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 820
8-Core 1,477
138% 1,149 Pts
64-Core 2,340
145% 2,340 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 120%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 168
Parallax 110
92% 130 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 98.9
Splatting 90.2
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 75 77 80 82 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 495
Mixed 422
SusWrite 99
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48.5
172% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 367
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000C36 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
184% Outstanding
MC Read 76.8
MC Write 62.9
MC Mixed 63.4
193% 67.7 GB/s
SC Read 52.6
SC Write 64.5
SC Mixed 57.9
167% 58.3 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 184%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 24" 1280 720 SPT09AB Sceptre C24
Typical PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28) Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback