PC Recoil III Rtx 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPC Recoil III Rtx 17  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GK7CP7S
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190329
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 00:33
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 240
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 759
73% 601 Pts
64-Core 1000
62% 1000 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (77 fps cap detected)
62.9% Good
Lighting 77
Reflection 77
Parallax 77
63% 77 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 77
Splatting 77
63% 77 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 78 78 79 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 396
Write 81.3
Mixed 116
SusWrite 78.1
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 17
68% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 90.2
DQ Mixed 108
88% 127 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 121%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
274GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 858 748 787 749 637 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1053
Write 1336
Mixed 740
SusWrite 770
220% 975 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 56.9
183% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 620
463% 629 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 175%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2666C18S4 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 27.9
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 27.2
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 75 24.5" 1536 811 IVM6132 PL2530H
Typical Recoil III Rtx 17 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: PC Recoil III Rtx 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback