Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

17 months ago, 26 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1919 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150626
Uptime	13.1 Days
Run Date	May 14 '24 at 23:28
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 85.9 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 125 57% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 339 34% 277 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Lighting 94.8 Reflection 130 Parallax 79.3 77% 101 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 80 Splatting 73.1 60% 73.5 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
QOPP 128GB 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0718B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 44 42 59 48 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68% Good	Read 492 Write 365 Mixed 388 SusWrite 52.9 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 69.8 4K Mixed 27.2 125% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 25.5 60% 122 MB/s

Kingston A400 120GB-$26 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 17GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 57 127 39 136 56 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.3% Poor	Read 215 Write 87.2 Mixed 82.9 SusWrite 84.9 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 10.3 42% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 14.7 DQ Write 15.9 DQ Mixed 14.4 11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.9% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	53	75	21.7"	1280 720	GSM5A35 22M45

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	877x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	649x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	442x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	122x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	86x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16