MSI MS-1822

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 304%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive512% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Raider 18 HX A14VHG
MotherboardMSI MS-1822  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240229
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 22:43
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 238
2-Core 454
130% 255 Pts
4-Core 861
8-Core 1,674
150% 1,268 Pts
64-Core 3,439
213% 3,439 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 140C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Lighting 289
Reflection 294
Parallax 342
236% 309 fps
MRender 442
Gravity 252
Splatting 198
231% 297 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 208%
Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2123 2436 2796 3443 3512 3568 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
512% Outstanding
Read 5,909
Write 3,711
Mixed 2,478
SusWrite 2,980
838% 3,769 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 57.6
200% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 279
315% 572 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 512%
Great: 565%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
138% Outstanding
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 51.3
152% 53 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 48.5
SC Mixed 28.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 138%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 18" 1280 720 AUOC5AC
Typical MS-1822 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-1822

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback