MSI B460M-A PRO (MS-7C88)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 25 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C88
MotherboardMSI B460M-A PRO (MS-7C88)  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 21:45
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600KF-$118
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 874
88% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,111
69% 1,111 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1209 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 67.5
43% 57.3 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 37.1
40% 49.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30021 500GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STPSC014
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 577
Write 1,249
Mixed 304
160% 710 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 43.1
162% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 946
DQ Write 725
DQ Mixed 889
650% 853 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 276%
PNY 480GB SATA SSD 480GB
10GB free
Firmware: U1125A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 513
Write 437
Mixed 397
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 24.9
137% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 46.4
94% 185 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
295GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 105 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 105
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX KHX3600C17D4/8GX 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 22.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 27.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 23.5" 1280 720 VSC0437 VX2458-mhd
Typical B460M-A PRO (MS-7C88) Builds (Compare 4,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI B460M-A PRO (MS-7C88) - $197

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $593
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback