Lenovo 20250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20250  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Durian 7A1
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 20:55
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 54
2-Core 76.8
46% 68.3 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 158
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3.9
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 187 97 94 106 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 364
Write 298
Mixed 217
SusWrite 151
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 23.9
87% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 191
165% 243 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 15 49 32 60 17.3" 1280 720 SEC4256
Typical 20250 Builds (Compare 379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback