TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 20:10
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 816
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,220
76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 82.2%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 3418)
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 90.4
54% 73.6 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 47.1
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 52.9%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 465 322 248 398 467 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 417
Write 428
Mixed 361
SusWrite 392
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 32.6
130% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 234
201% 297 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 94.7%
 Great: 122%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
52GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 91 90 106 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 112
Write 103
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 94.7
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 59.4%
 Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 25.2
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 74.9%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 213 58 144 27" 1280 720 AUS27AF VG278
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD  $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples76x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples70x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples53x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples49x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples17x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL  $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback