HP 700-214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 700-214  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 18:37
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 97.5
51% 82 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 306
38% 291 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2AF7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.8
2% 3.7 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 67 51 58 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.3% Below average
Read 31.2
Write 90.9
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 67.3
13% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 17.7
68% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 21.6
DQ Mixed 35.6
41% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 27 5 60 20" 1680 987 DELD010 DELL E207WFP
Typical 700-214 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback