Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 18:27
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 185
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 525
47% 397 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 140F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 97.4
Parallax 91.4
72% 92.3 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 81.3
Splatting 82.6
78% 98.4 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKF256G8L 256GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L08P
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,582
Write 732
Mixed 588
211% 967 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 67.3
222% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 388
309% 452 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 236%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
198GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 33 38 84 78 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 99.9
Write 51.4
Mixed 3
SusWrite 57.3
38% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.5% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 22.2
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 0R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 13% 55 162 1 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback