Asus FX503VM

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus FX503VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX503VM
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190429
Uptime	8.3 Days
Run Date	May 14 '24 at 18:21
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 76.5 2-Core 138 59% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 138 24% 168 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 154E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.6% Average	Lighting 54.1 Reflection 57.7 Parallax 49 44% 53.6 fps	MRender 61.3 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 49.5 43% 52.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KingFast 256GB 7,147 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 88 18 12 26 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 318 Write 261 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 65.5 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 1.2 44% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 0.4 56% 135 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 139%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 62GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 76 63 57 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 49.1 Write 86.4 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 66.9 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.4 146% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.8% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 20.6 64% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 20.6 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	45	9	60	15.5"	1536 801	AUO61ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FX503VM Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Asus FX503VM

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	209x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	198x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	406x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	68x
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples	46x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	78x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	68x
76.D305G.D390B 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 6,956 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16